Before #AcWriMo: Have You Found Your Writing People? Some Tips to Find Them and Give Good Feedback

Are you like me? Having another person with whom to be accountable helps me to write more, think more, and research more. But it can be difficult to find individuals with whom we can share writing. As we head into Academic Writing Month (#AcWriMo), where people pledge to write every day (including Thanksgiving and for me, my birthday), consider who in your life can be your readers. Get them ready now. Here are some tips to find your writing people.

So what can one do?

First, check out your institution’s teaching and learning center. Often they sponsor writing groups (which last for weeks or an academic term) or writing workshops (often one or two day events). The former usually involve sharing of one’s work for critique whereas the latter is more “writing alone, but together.”

A second way is to see if your disciplinary groups sponsor any writing groups (often now, virtual ones). They sometimes have groups depending on one’s status (e.g., doctoral students, newer scholars, post-tenure scholars, etc.).

A third way–and one that likely most of us have figured out–is to find people with whom you trust sharing your less-than-perfect drafts. This may happen during graduate school–peers bond and form a writing group in order to make it through writing papers, theses, and dissertations. Or it might be that you found a like-minded person at professional meetings.

Find your first reader, or what Stephen King in his book On Writing calls his “Ideal Reader” (who for him, is his wife, Tabitha). Write for that person to read and enjoy what you have to say.

I want to advocate for widening your “circle of persons” beyond your academic sub-discipline. My husband is a physicist and I am a sociologist but he is my first reader and the one I trust the most. We’ve learned (a bit the hard way) that we cannot be in the same room as he reads and then edits what I have written, because I will question every mark he makes on the paper. But if I let him alone, to edit in peace, he can hone my writing in helpful ways. He makes my writing more terse–I could take (okay, have taken) a few pages to just say “Hello.” That’s not a physicist’s way of writing. Most of the time, shortening my prose is a good thing. He also spots sociological jargon, often circling it and asking “could you say this differently?” That helps me to remember the importance of audience and understanding the readers for whom one is writing. It’s not that I agree with all his comments or follow through on them, but his insights help me to step outside of “me as author” to see my prose from the perspective of a possible reader.

I live for a side comment that shows he got my joke or enjoyed a story I shared. That helps me to gain confidence in not only what I am saying, but how I am communicating it.

So I encourage you to find your first reader. It will take time to develop the trust and confidence in that person’s critique. Think about what kinds of other readers you might need. I’m a qualitative sociologist (an ethnographer primarily) and so I often get asked to read qualitative manuscripts. Got a highly statistical piece of writing? I might not be your best choice, because that is not a specialty of mine. So consider that your “writing people” might need to change depending on the topic, the audience for which you are writing, and the type of writing you are doing.

As you expand your circle of “writing people” beyond your first reader, I encourage you to consider individuals who are not just friends. Friendships can become strained with a difficult critique, so think about choosing colleagues who might not be close friends. The difficulty, of course is the act of building up trust often shifts the colleague to a friend.

One way to minimize harsh feelings after receiving a critique is to play a role in constructing what kind of advice you will receive. Tell these early readers of your manuscript the types of feedback you might want. What do I mean? Here are some “hints” I have given readers:

-“I feel my argument broke down about p. 7–how do you feel there? If you agree, do you have any suggestions?”

-I feel my transitions between paragraphs in this section are not strong. Any thoughts?

-“What would you think if I reorganized these paragraphs in this order (then tell them the alternative order)–would that be better?”

-“Where did you feel I ‘lost you’?” Again, I believe that even scientific writing should tell a story, so learning where the reader “lost the plot” is crucial feedback to receive.

-“I hate this manuscript right now. Do you think that is just me ‘hitting a writing wall’ or is there something fundamentally wrong with it, in your opinion? Help me to see it how you see it.”

-“I’m not looking for grammar or style edits right now; I would, however, welcome ‘big picture’ comments.”

My last suggestion about finding your “writing circle” is to not be stingy. Don’t just ask for their time but then never step up and return the favor. These kinds of arrangements are built on reciprocity. If you have to beg off once (say, during finals week, if your institution’s calendar goes longer than your colleague’s) that is okay (but always offer the explanation) but be sure to reach out when you can to see if it is too late to help. If it is–do the next request. The person who always asks for and receives feedback but never reads and offers it back will quickly be dropped from these kinds of informal writing groups. Don’t be that person.

I’ve been leading two online writing groups for the last 18 months. I have learned so much about people’s writing processes and how I can best give feedback. One way that I hope members of these groups would agree with, is that I try to give feedback as soon as I see they uploaded a document. I know what it feels like to wait, and wait, and wait and I don’t want to be that person to someone else. I’ve also learned that I struggle to turn off my synesthesia–I’ll catch typos and extra spaces for them.

If you struggle finding your writing persons, that could be one reason to find an editor. Part of our job is to read and give feedback about argument, flow, organization, and readability.

Of course–finding your writing people first means that you have to write. Are you? If not, start. Maybe it is two sentences or three paragraphs. It doesn’t matter–just start. Don’t think about what it says–just write. And for November, join with lots of us who will write every day.

Please visit the Pedagogical Thoughts website to contact me about institutional or individual consulting, dissertation editing, or coaching about writing and editing faculty manuscripts.

Do You Listen To Your Inner Voice Too Much? How To Tame It, Just A Bit

Many of my dissertation authoring-clients reach out to me for editing and coaching when they have hit a wall. You might know this wall; I sure do. It’s the “it’s okay now, but it has to be perfect” wall. I understand the sentiment; I have lived under its burden for many years. But the search for perfection–be it in our scholarly life or our personal life–is a search that postpones life and career instead of letting us enjoy them.

What do I mean? Wanting to write the perfect dissertation or the perfect monograph or to find the perfect partner and create a perfect life together or whatever else you find yourself striving to be perfect at–is a mental trap that can harm your projects, your partner, and yourself.

So I talk with my clients about finding the “sweet spot” between obtaining committee approval and being personally happy with the dissertation. I share that this “sweet spot” will likely be fleeting. Even if the committee is happy with the dissertation, that often they, as authors, might start to pick apart the document even before it is submitted. The voice of perfectionism could be “But if I rewrote this one section it would be better” or “I just saw a few new sources that I should probably cite” or a thousand other thoughts. I’ve found that the voice usually gets louder the closer the manuscript is to actually being done.

What I have found, is that perfectionism is my fear speaking, rather than my expertise, creativity, or originality. It could be my fear of what others might think, or the fear of being just categorically wrong about my analysis, or the fear of being embarrassed by not seeing an analytical error that others will see right away. Or…………the list could go on and on.

So I have to fight constantly against perfectionism and have found a few things that can work for me and have worked for my clients:

-Name the fear for what it is. It’s not perfectionism, but the fact that once I tweet out a column, even if I made a colossal error–I can’t get the tweet back. It’s on the Internet, forever. Or it’s that feeling of “what if no one buys the book once it is published?” It’s shame, or worry “about future embarrassment,” and so on. Naming whatever is behind your perfectionism can take away some of its power over you.

-Then I come up with a counterexample. “Even if I made a mistake, it won’t be as bad as….” Fill in the blank of whichever mathematical/scientific/analytical or spelling/grammar error you are aware of!

-Then I try to find one new thought in my manuscript –even if I made a mistake elsewhere, that would be an original contribution. This helps me to realize that not every word has to be “perfect” to still be academically useful.

-If none of those work, I try this: “Really, how many people are going to read this, anyway? Don’t be so full of yourself.” Honesty–brutal honesty–usually helps me to get over the fear and procrastination. It isn’t always easy, but it can work.

-If I have not already sent out the manuscript to a friend or colleague for comment, I might do that now. Even one person’s positive thoughts (who is not my husband/First Reader) can be enough to get me over this perfectionist “hump.” The danger with this tip–at least for me–is I could focus more on negative feedback than any positives they gave.

-Don’t laugh: another trick I try to deal with my procrastination about a manuscript, is to switch to one about which I feel even worse! That way, comparatively, the first one seems better, without even changing a word! Try it–it works! Try to have at least two manuscripts always in process. They could be different chapters of the dissertation or monograph or completely different writing projects.

-Another way that I can break through procrastination and that ‘cutting’ internal voice is to work on references. Pulling out the APA or ASA style manual and being sure that each citation is in the correct style is mind-numbing. But it quiets that inner voice (maybe it gets bored?) and keeps it away for quite a while. And that’s success. I can shift back to writing in a few hours and be creative again.

-I know others who name their inner critic as well as their inner cheerleader and they talk to them, helping them to understand the other “side” of you and your writing and learn how to control or manage each one.

-Journaling can be a similar way to meet your inner critic, take it seriously–to a point–and then to turn down its voice’s volume. If you journal with both your inner critic and inner cheerleader, you might try using two ink colors or font colors if you journal online. Notice which color/voice is getting more of your attention and work to creating more parity between them. Perhaps even in the beginning of a writing project, have much more cheerleader than critic, but as you shift into self-editing or listening to outside reviewers, the critic voice might have some useful ideas. Don’t always assume it’s working against you and your writing project. Sometimes it’s ideas are wonderful–but causing fear of failure.

So if you ever procrastinate, do you know why? Is it fear? If so, of what? How do you manage to work though it and make progress on your work? Let’s share ideas in the comments.

Please visit the Pedagogical Thoughts website to contact me about dissertation editing or faculty editing of manuscripts (final edits or developmental editing of your document) or coaching about writing.

Is Pre-AcWriMo a Thing? It Should Be

I confess…2022 has been unexpectedly difficult in terms of writing. I thought that my attention would be able to focus on the writing that I want to do, but I’m struggling. How about you? It’s hard to sit down and write. I have lots of excuses— I’ve had intense preparation for a lawsuit I am involved in; I am having trouble choosing a topic from the list of 70 I made at the end of December; I’ve gotten more involved in my local political party, which has taken up some time I might have been writing; I am trying to find time to exercise more, which takes up writing time (so goes my excuse at least), and so on. The list could go on and on!

I’m starting to think about #AcWriMo (Academic Writing Month) which normally takes place in November and am trying to create a plan that I can stick with. AcWriMo is pledging to yourself that you will write every day in November, yes, even on Thanksgiving.

So it’s time to get ready—with the scientific data that I know works. So here’s my plan and my question to you: Anyone want to join me?

-I will sit down to write every weekday for the next two weeks by noon.

-I will stay writing (or trying to) for at least 15 minutes at a time.

-I will write at least 100 words 3 out of 5 weekdays (at least), on something academic.

-I won’t check Twitter and other social media (sorry, academic Twitter and my favorite political accounts) first thing in the morning.

You don’t have to follow my commitments, but if you need to get some writing done—what are yours? Science proves that even a small amount of time (15 minutes) can make a significant dent in a writing project. On one hand, given the pandemic, teaching and preparation (mask-to-mask or via remote learning or some Hyflex combination) can take up more time than ever before. So can parenting and relationships that have been stretched and stressed for well over a year.

But find time a few days a week to think, to write. Make the progress you want. And remember, writing can be a way to think through a project—the writing does not have to be the end product, it can be a way to get to the end product.

Grab a notebook, your favorite pen or if you’re a digital writer, grab your favorite device. Let’s do this. Together. Add a comment about how it is going for you.

Please visit the Pedagogical Thoughts website to contact me about institutional or individual consulting, dissertation editing, or coaching about writing.